The Common Core Debate Rages Onto a Bigger Stage

Since its inception, the Common Core initiative has been a hotly debated issue. The question of whether or not to adopt a uniform national curriculum has been considered by educators, administrators, and parents. Now, the battle lines are being drawn on a bigger stage.

The Albert Shanker Institute recently released a manifesto entitled A Call for Common Content. Calling for equally high education standards across the country, the statement supports the Common Core Standards, praising their "clearer vision of what students should learn and be able to do as they progress through school." It argues that in order to ensure "equal educational opportunity," a common standard must be instituted and upheld.

Not long after, a "counter-manifesto" was released. With signatories from a variety of political and educational institutions, Closing the Door on Innovation rejects the idea of a single national curriculum. The document refuses to "support this effort to undermine control of public school curriculum and instruction at the local and state level." It argues that adopting one must-use system stifles innovation, denying educators the right to adjust and develop curricula from their own experiences. It speaks strongly against the Common Core Standards themselves, as well, calling them "inadequate."

Both documents are signed by supporters big and small. Both make compelling arguments. And both call for support from people like us. It seems the battle lines are being drawn for the Common Core debate. Which side will you be on? Share your opinions in the comments section below.